|
|
davidtanny's Blog
Topic: Thread Closed
|
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d This thread is hereby closed.
|
Member Comments:
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Don't quite think so. They weren't smoking in bed and British actors are notorious for their Socialism, so they never vote Republican..or Conservative. But British and Canadian comedy...is there a comparison? That could be a good forum topic. Monty Python, Kids in the Hall- contrast and compare.
aduerksen3:
---
shouldn't that be "boot to the head"?
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d shouldn't that be "boot to the head"?
Stavro Arrgolus:
---
These days, when the fuzz shows up, you get 'hit on the head' lessons whether you want them or not.
|
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d These days, when the fuzz shows up, you get 'hit on the head' lessons whether you want them or not.
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Sure it ain't is isn't not so
Stavro Arrgolus:
---
Yes it is.
peterpuck9:
---
Look, this isn't an argument.
Stavro Arrgolus:
---
No, it isn't.
peterpuck9:
---
Yes it is.
|
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Yes it is.
peterpuck9:
---
Look, this isn't an argument.
Stavro Arrgolus:
---
No, it isn't.
peterpuck9:
---
Yes it is.
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Look, this isn't an argument.
Stavro Arrgolus:
---
No, it isn't.
peterpuck9:
---
Yes it is.
Stavro Arrgolus:
---
No, it isn't.
nutcase:
---
This thread is hereby closed.
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d The "Unread Forum Posts!" links provide a function that accomplishes much of that, without making the threads otherwise unavailable.
The only threads I notice to take any length of time to load are the YouTube threads (mostly because YouTube sometimes takes so long to load their images), but we usually do pretty good at making sure the thread is changed every quarter.
Tim P. Ryan:
---
An alternative would be a 'forget' button, which would take the thread off of your thread lists. Another would be 'sleep', which would make sure it does not come up in your browsing unless there is new activity on it.
fm123:
---
You know, that is one feature we do not have on this site, the ability to close or lock a thread.
Might be nice to have such a feature, so we can close some of the long, slow loading threads, and simply start another one, if needed.
|
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d No, it isn't.
peterpuck9:
---
Yes it is.
Stavro Arrgolus:
---
No, it isn't.
nutcase:
---
This thread is hereby closed.
|
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Yes it is.
Stavro Arrgolus:
---
No, it isn't.
nutcase:
---
This thread is hereby closed.
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d An alternative would be a 'forget' button, which would take the thread off of your thread lists. Another would be 'sleep', which would make sure it does not come up in your browsing unless there is new activity on it.
fm123:
---
You know, that is one feature we do not have on this site, the ability to close or lock a thread.
Might be nice to have such a feature, so we can close some of the long, slow loading threads, and simply start another one, if needed.
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Darn, looks like I missed another one!
nutcase:
---
This thread is hereby closed.
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d You know, that is one feature we do not have on this site, the ability to close or lock a thread.
Might be nice to have such a feature, so we can close some of the long, slow loading threads, and simply start another one, if needed.
|
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d No, it isn't.
nutcase:
---
This thread is hereby closed.
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d
nutcase:
---
This thread is hereby closed.
So is this one :)
|
|
|
|
|